Cookie Notice

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our cookies information for more details.

OK
skip to main content

Head-to-head study shows non-allergists perform comparably in low-risk penicillin allergy

Published: February 18, 2024

Penicillin "allergy" labels are common but often misdiagnosed – with up to 90% of labels found to be incorrect after evaluation. Correcting incorrect allergy labels (known as “delabeling”) can allow patients to re-use life-saving penicillin antibiotics, which has been shown to improve outcomes and reduce the development of multidrug-resistant organisms.

Given the overwhelming number of mislabeled penicillin allergy labels and relative lack of allergists, evaluations by non-allergists have been advocated for low-risk patients. One example was the Hong Kong Drug Allergy Delabeling Initiative (HK-DADI), which was a previous pilot study demonstrating the effectiveness of a nurse-led penicillin allergy delabeling initiative. However, more definitive evidence on the effectiveness, safety, and impact of such non-allergist initiatives were previously lacking.

Mak et al. report findings from a prospective, multi-center study performed between four centers in Hong Kong – HK-DADI2, published in The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice. This study directly compared the outcomes, safety, and impact on quality of life of more than 220 patients undergoing penicillin allergy evaluation over 2-years. Regardless of evaluation by allergists or non-allergists, the majority (>93%) of penicillin allergy labels could be safely delabeled with significant improvements in patient quality-of-life. There were no significant differences between evaluations conducted by allergists and non-allergists. However, non-allergist evaluations had shorter waiting times, while allergists required fewer consultations and were more likely to complete evaluation within one single visit.   

With proper training and support, non-allergists can independently conduct penicillin allergy evaluation among low-risk individuals. Compared to allergists, evaluation of low-risk penicillin allergy by non-allergists can be comparably effective, safe, and impactful on quality-of-life. Effective strategies for fostering long-term, interdisciplinary collaborations between allergists and non-allergists should be further encouraged.

The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice is an official journal of the AAAAI, focusing on practical information for the practicing clinician.

Full Article