Resources Relevant to the Implementation
of Core ACGME-Required Competencies


Module III
    Systems-based practice
         Assessment




Assessment of fellow by faculty
Rating scale

American Board of Internal Medicine
(ABIM)
[adapted]
In its Portfolio for Internal Medicine Residency Programs: Evaluating your residents: New competencies, new forms, the ABIM suggests a number of questions that may be used to assess the competency of systems-based practice. The ABIM suggests that programs determine the appropriateness of question use.

An adaptation of the ABIM questions was chosen for the AAAAI toolbox for a number of reasons. First, the questions focus clearly on aspects of systems-based practice. This targeted assessment is needed both to assure compliance with the ACGME mandate and also to provide useful, targeted feedback to fellows. Seven questions, representing three components of practice-based learning and improvement, were selected for use.

Although the ABIM recommends use of a 9-point scale ranging from unsatisfactory to superior, there is considerable evidence that programs have difficulty using this scale in a standard way. The adapted version of the items suggested for use by A/I training programs uses a 5-point frequency scale with descriptors for each point.

The ABIM has granted permission for use of its core competencies by A/I training programs.

It should be noted that while these questions provide a summary assessment, the information needed to answer the questions must be obtained from a variety of other types of observation and assessment. For example, to assess the degree to which a fellow begins discharge planning at admission, one would rely on evaluation of case presentations and chart reviews. Another example would be to assess the degree to which a fellow utilizes hospital resources effectively by relying on information obtained through chart-stimulated recall.

The adapted ABIM form is an example of a modification of assessment via global rating. The ACGME, in its draft Toolbox of Assessment Methods, provides some information about the properties and uses of global rating for assessment.

TOP


Multi-purpose
assessment of
systems-based
practice

Portfolio assessment

Portfolios provide a way to collect evaluative information about several aspects of systems-based practice. Aspects that can be assessed in this manner knowledge of delivery systems and patient advocacy, for example.

Portfolios are collections of materials prepared by the learner that show evidence of learning or achievement relative to a plan. While their use in graduate medical education is relatively new, portfolios have the potential to be useful in many aspects of competency assurance. Important components of effective portfolio use include creation of a learning plan with specific goals and objectives, collection of materials showing evidence of achievement, reflection by the learner, and assessment of the materials by the learner and by faculty.

The ACGME, in its draft Toolbox of Assessment Methods, provides some information about the properties and uses of portfolios for assessment.

TOP


Commentary
on the need
for 360-degree
assessment
360-degree evaluation 360-degree evaluations have the potential to provide a way to assess several components of systems-based practice. Aspects that may be assessed in this manner include practice of cost-effective care and advocacy for patients.

360-degree evaluations are assessments completed by multiple others with whom one interacts. The notion of 360-degrees means that supervisors, peers, and subordinates, and in the case of health care, patients and families, all provide information about an individual’s performance.

360-degree feedback has been used extensively in business organizations. It is beginning to be used in the health care administration arena. At this point in time, however, there is no evidence in the literature of the use of 360-degree evaluation in graduate medical education. The notion of such a type of assessment is appealing for the wide-ranging information it has the potential to bring to GME, and the ACGME recommends its use in a number of competency domains, including systems-based practice. The ACGME, in its draft Toolbox of Assessment Methods, provides some information about the properties and uses of 360-degree evaluation for assessment.

It is recommended that the AAAAI consider working to develop a useful 360-degree evaluation tailored for health care practice. Such a measure would not only be a valuable resource in the assessment of fellows in training but also could fulfill the same role for maintenance of certification.

TOP

Return to Table of Contents
Return to Assessment Overview
Return to Systems-based practice Overview
Move forward to Systems-based practice Resources


©Copyright 2002 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma,& Immunology All Rights Reserved