Resources Relevant to the Implementation
of Core ACGME-Required Competencies


Module II
    Practice-based learning & improvement
          Example




Example 
   
This module contains a large number of resources and materials. Training programs will vary considerably in the type and number of resources they choose to use. There is no one best way in which to use the materials contained in this module.

As programs become familiar with the materials, it is likely that they will adapt resource use to align with specific program needs and abilities. To begin, it may be useful to have an example of a way in which to use the materials.

This approach is not meant to prescribe what one should do but is meant to provide a comprehensive example of what one could do with these materials to meet the ACGME mandates. What follows is a description or example of how one actual program director might choose to use these materials.

TOP

Step 1: The program director meets with new fellows to discuss the role of the ACGME competencies in the training program.

Step 2: The program director meets with other GME program directors to consider curricular overlaps.

In this example, the GME program directors decide to work together on a monthly Brown Bag series that will address issues related to the core competencies. Twice yearly, the competency addressed will be practice-based learning and improvement.

Step 3: The program director introduces fellows to the assessment tools selected for use by the program. In this example, the adapted ABIM questions, the Clinical Effectiveness Teaching Instrument, and the portfolio assessment have been selected for use.

Portfolios are begun by having fellows create a learning plan, including goals and objectives, for some discrete period of time.

In this example, the time period is six months.

As an example, one fellow might identify learning goals related to finding, understanding, and using evidence while another fellow might identify learning goals related to increasing her or his effectiveness as a clinical teacher and analyzing one’s own practice to find opportunities for improvement.

Step 4. Fellows are encouraged to assess, develop, and test their skills at using informational technology to identify sources of evidence-based information. Some may choose to use the SUNY Health Sciences Evidence-based Medicine Course to locate information on topics such as constructing effective searches for a variety of types of questions. They may choose to document learning with the
self-assessment exercises available from Netting the Evidence. Resource use, results, and reflection are documented in the portfolio.

Step 5: Fellows are encouraged to assess, develop, and test their skills at understanding various research designs. Some may choose to use the SUNY Health Sciences Evidence-based Medicine Course to obtain information about evaluating the results of various types of studies such as prognosis and harm studies and meta-analysis. Resource use, results, and reflection are documented in the portfolio.

Step 6: Fellows may present a case at a seminar. This provides an opportunity to demonstrate use of evidence. Participation and/or the case write-up may be included in the portfolio.

Step 7: Fellows are regularly involved in clinical teaching. Some may choose to use the resources available on the Residents’ Teaching Skills Website. A fellow may use the teaching skills inventory to identify his or her teaching style. Some may choose to use the checklists available from the Center for Instructional Support. Resource use, results, and reflection are documented in the portfolio.

Step 8: Fellows are encouraged to analyze their own practice to find opportunities for improvement. A fellow might choose to use information from the article A Patient-centered Approach to Applying Guidelines for Treating Tobacco Dependence as a reference point. Resource use, results, and reflection are documented in the portfolio.

Step 9: Every six months, the Clinical Effectiveness Teaching Instrument is distributed to students and junior colleagues who can evaluate and provide feedback about the fellow’s teaching effectiveness. Results are tallied and documented.

Step 10: Every six months, faculty complete the adapted ABIM questions for each fellow. Results are tallied and documented.


Step 11: Throughout each six month time period, fellows document experiences in their portfolios that align with their learning plan.

Step 12: The program director meets with each fellow every six months to provide feedback from all assessment tools noted above as well as other sources of information.

TOP

Return to Table of Contents
Return to Practice-based learning & improvement Overview
Return to Practice-based learning & improvement Assessments
Return to Practice-based learning & improvement Resources
Move ahead to Systems-based practice Overview


©Copyright 2002 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma,& Immunology All Rights Reserved