SELECTED ARTICLES FROM THE RECENT LITERATURE 2003
11/26/03
Adverse reactions to infliximab
Summary
Infliximab (Flix) trade name Remicade, is a chimeric monoclonal antibody
against tumor necrosis factor alpha. Flix is being tried in the treatment of
a variety of disorders, particularly severe rheumatoid arthritis and
inflammatory bowel disease. In early clinical trials of Flix, a very low
incidence of adverse reactions were observed. Cheifetz et al of the Mt.
Sinai Medical Center in New York described the incidence of allergic type
adverse reactions in 165 consecutive patients who received 479 Flix
infusions over a period of 30 months. They observed an overall incidence of
adverse reactions during 6.1% of the infusions of which about 5% were acute
and 1% were severe. Serum tryptase levels were not increased. All acute
reactions were controlled with appropriate therapy depending on
manifestations : 1) slow infusion rate to 10ml/hour; 2) dephenhydramine,
acetaminophen; 3) epinephrine prn chest tightening; 4) solu-steroids if
significant dyspnea/wheezing; 5) stop infusion if severe urticaria or
systolic BP decreases ä 40mm. Maintain airway and oxygenation.
Individuals with previous mild-moderate adverse reactions to Flix were
re-treated with Flix using a prophylactic regimen: 1) pre-treatment with
diphenhydramine 25-50 mg po and acetaminophen (650 mg po) 1.5 hours prior to
infusion; 2) test infusion of Flix at slow rate (4 drops/minute) for 15
minutes; 3) if Flix tolerated, increase infusion rate gradually every 15
minutes as tolerated until 40 drops/minute. All such treated patients
tolerated the repeat Flix infusions without adverse reactions.
In 3 patients with severe reactions to Flix, repeat Flix infusions were
tried using the prophylactic regimen described above. Two tolerated this
Flix treatment with no problems; a repeat severe reaction occurred in the
third patient.
Reference
Am J Gastroent 2003;98:1315-24
Editor's Comments
Serious systemic adverse reactions to Flix infusions appear to be quite
infrequent but do occur occasionally. Since the mechanisms underlying these
adverse reactions are not known, the treatment of such reactions and attempted
prophylaxis for repeat infusions described above is pragmatic. However, it
appears to be generally successful. More investigation of possible immune and
other pathogenic mechanisms is warranted.
|