SELECTED ARTICLES FROM THE RECENT LITERATURE 2003
11/18/03
Additional recommendations for quality asthma care
Summary
The National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP), sponsored by
the NHLBI (NIH), issued an updated Expert Panel Report in 2002. Recently,
the CDC in collaboration with the NAEPP, issued a companion to that report
describing key clinical activities for quality asthma care. Several points
were emphasized:
1) The diagnosis of asthma and its level of its severity should be made as
soon as feasible. In individuals older than 5 years, this can generally be
done on the basis of history, physical exam and spirometry. In children < 5
years old one cannot reliably do spirometry to confirm a diagnosis of
asthma. Therefore, one may have to use the diagnosis "suspected asthma".
2) Routine follow-up is important even when asthma symptoms are intermittent
because the pattern may change. A reasonable frequency of such follow-up
visits is every 1-6 months depending on the severity of the asthma and
symptom control in an individual patient.
3) A referral for specialty care in asthma is indicated if:
a) A life-threatening acute asthma flare has occurred
b) Treatment goals are not reached
c) Atypical symptoms - unclear asthma diagnosis
d) Environmental triggers likely
e) Severe, persistent asthma
f) Need for additional diagnostic testing or education of patient
g) Moderate persistent asthma in children < 3 years old
h) Allergy immunotherapy may be indicated
i) Patient requires continuous oral or high dose inhaled corticosteroids (or
more than 2 burst courses of oral steroids/year).
4) Co-morbid conditions (e.g. - allergic rhinitis, sinusitis, GERD) should
be treated thoroughly
5) Medication type and use should be dictated by the degree of
severity/persistence of asthma symptoms. All those with persistent asthma
need controller medication, usually inhaled corticosteroids. The frequency
of the rescue use of inhaled beta agonists should be monitored carefully for
an indefinite time period.
6) A written asthma management plan should be developed for all patients
including tips about:
a) recognizing worsening asthma;
b) appropriate medication use for changing asthmatic status;
c) when to seek medical care;
d) how to monitor responses to changes in therapy.
Reference
MMWR 2003;52 (RR-6) 1-8
Editor's Comments
These guidelines sound quite sensible and appropriate. The parallel
treatment of co-morbid conditions should be employed in face of evidence
that adequate treatment of concomitant allergic rhinitis and sinusitis can
help asthma management.
Although written management plans are still strongly recommended, recent
studies have not shown impressively better asthma control when a written (vs
an oral) plan was used. This may be because the written plans are above the
reading comprehension of many patients.
|